“He showed me the brightness of the world.”
That’s how my teacher, Ajaan Fuang, once described his debt to his own teacher, Ajaan Lee. His words took me by surprise. I had only recently begun studying with him, still fresh from an education where I’d learned that serious Buddhists took a dark, pessimistic view of life. Yet here was a man who had dedicated his life to the Buddha’s teachings, speaking instead of brightness.
Of course, by “brightness,” he didn’t mean the pleasures of food, art, travel, sports, or family life—the kinds of things you’d find in the Sunday paper. He was talking about a deeper happiness that comes from within. As I got to know him, I began to see how deeply happy he really was. He could be skeptical of human pretensions, but I’d never call him negative or pessimistic. “Realistic” was closer to the truth. Still, for a long time I couldn’t shake the feeling of paradox: how could the supposed pessimism of Buddhism take shape in such a grounded, joyful person?
Only when I began reading the early texts for myself did I realize that what I thought was a paradox was actually an irony. Buddhism, which gives such a positive view of human potential for real happiness, is often labeled in the West as negative and life-denying.
You’ve probably heard the claim that “Life is suffering” is the first principle of Buddhism—the Buddha’s first noble truth. It’s a famous line, often repeated by teachers and scholars alike. But it’s not quite right. The Buddha actually taught four truths, not one:
- There is suffering.
- There is a cause of suffering.
- There is an end to suffering.
- There is a path that leads to that end.
Taken together, these truths are anything but pessimistic. They describe a practical, problem-solving method—like a doctor diagnosing and curing an illness, or a mechanic fixing an engine. You identify the problem, find its cause, and remove it.
What’s special about the Buddha’s approach is that the “illness” he addresses is human suffering itself, and the cure is something anyone can apply. Just as a doctor with a guaranteed cure for measles doesn’t fear the disease, the Buddha wasn’t afraid to face suffering directly. Having discovered a happiness that’s completely unconditional, he wasn’t afraid to point out the stress hidden in the pleasures we cling to. Instead of running away from suffering, he taught us to examine it carefully. By understanding it, we can uncover its cause and bring it to an end—completely. That’s not pessimism; that’s confidence.
So why does the idea of Buddhism as pessimistic still linger? Maybe because, when we approach Buddhism from a Western background, we expect it to answer our own cultural question: Is the world good or bad?
In the Book of Genesis, this was God’s first question after finishing creation: had he done a good job? He looked at the world and saw that it was good. Ever since, people in the West have taken sides—agreeing or disagreeing with that verdict—but always assuming it’s the right question to ask.
When Theravāda Buddhism encountered Christian missionaries during the colonial era, some Buddhists—educated by those same missionaries—accepted that question and tried to answer it on their own terms. They argued that the first noble truth proved God wrong: if life is full of suffering, then the world can’t be “good.” It was an effective debate tactic at the time, but it missed the Buddha’s real point.
The Buddha wasn’t trying to judge creation. He wasn’t asking whether life is good or bad. He was asking a much more practical question: where does suffering come from, and how can we end it?
In one discourse, a brahman named Dīghanakha—whose name means “Long-Nails”—comes to the Buddha and declares, “I don’t approve of anything.” If the Buddha had really meant “life is suffering,” this would have been the perfect time to agree. But instead, he challenged the whole idea of approving or disapproving of life at all.
He explained that there are three possible positions:
- Nothing is worth approving of.
- Everything is worth approving of.
- Some things are, and some things aren’t.
Take any of these positions, he said, and you’ll just end up arguing with people who disagree. So what’s the point?
Instead, the Buddha taught Dīghanakha to look directly at his body and feelings as examples of suffering—unstable, unreliable, not worth clinging to as self. When Dīghanakha followed this advice and let go, he caught his first glimpse of something beyond suffering—the Deathless.
The lesson is simple: trying to decide whether the world is good or bad is a waste of time. The real task is to see where suffering arises, understand it, and release it.
The problem isn’t the body or feelings themselves—it’s the clinging to them. The Buddha described all forms of suffering as “the five aggregates of clinging”: attachment to physical form, feelings, perceptions, thought constructs, and consciousness. When we cling to these things, they cause suffering. When we don’t, they lead to lasting benefit and peace.
So the first noble truth, simply put, is that clinging is suffering.
Because of clinging, physical pain turns into mental pain. Because of clinging, aging, illness, and death become emotional torment. The irony is that in trying to hold onto things, we don’t control them—we trap ourselves.
If the Buddha had said “life is suffering,” there would be no escape except death or annihilation. But he didn’t say that. He said clinging is suffering—which means there is a way out. If we can see and let go of our clinging, suffering ends.
Of course, the mind doesn’t stop clinging just because we tell it to. It’s like a stubborn child: if you force it to let go while you’re watching, it just hides its attachments where you can’t see them. The Buddha identified this hiding place—ignorance—as the real root of suffering. Ignorance gives rise to craving, which leads to clinging.
That’s why the fourth noble truth describes a path of practice: the Eightfold Path. It includes right view, right resolve, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, and right concentration. In short, it’s about abandoning and developing—abandoning unskillful habits and developing qualities that bring clarity and awareness.
Abandoning means avoiding thoughts, words, and actions driven by craving. Developing means cultivating mindfulness, concentration, and discernment until they’re strong enough to see clearly into the mind. Only then can you let even those go.
It’s like climbing a ladder to reach a rooftop. You hold onto each rung until you find a higher one, letting go as you rise. As your view expands, you see more clearly where the mind is clinging and what needs to be done:
- The parts that are suffering should be understood.
- The causes of suffering should be abandoned.
- The path should be cultivated.
- The end of suffering should be realized.
Step by step, you climb until you reach the roof. That’s when you can finally let go of the ladder completely—and be free.
So the real question isn’t whether life or the world is good or bad. It’s this: how skillfully are we handling our experience? Are we clinging in ways that keep suffering going, or are we learning to let go wisely?
When we approach life with all four noble truths in mind—not just the first—we see that life contains both suffering and the end of suffering. And that brings hope: the hope that we can see clearly, let go of what binds us, and discover for ourselves the brightness that shines when suffering finally comes to an end.
Link: https://wisdomtea.org/2025/10/16/the-brightness-of-the-world/









